王英宇,张家伟,黄运凯,等.Φ6 mm–2A10铝合金棒材电磁镦粗变形机理数值仿真研究[J].精密成形工程,2023,15(6):11-18.
WANG Ying-yu,ZHANG Jia-wei,HUANG Yun-kai,et al.Numerical Simulation on Deformation Mechanism of Φ6 mm-2A10 Aluminum Alloy Bars under Electromagnetic Upsetting[J].Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering,2023,15(6):11-18. |
| Φ6 mm–2A10铝合金棒材电磁镦粗变形机理数值仿真研究 |
| Numerical Simulation on Deformation Mechanism of Φ6 mm-2A10 Aluminum Alloy Bars under Electromagnetic Upsetting |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-6457.2023.06.002 |
| 中文关键词: 电磁镦粗 数值模拟 试验研究 2A10铝合金 变形机理 |
| 英文关键词: electromagnetic upsetting numerical simulation experimental study 2A10 aluminum alloy deformation mechanism |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52005055);湖南省自然科学基金(2022JJ40475);湖南省教育厅优秀青年基金(22B0340) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1699 |
| 全文下载次数: 882 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 针对块体材料在高应变速率成形过程中应力、应变结果等很难获得的情况，通过数值模拟方法揭示其变形机理。方法 将电磁成形技术和镦粗工艺相结合，建立电磁镦粗电磁场–力场数值耦合模型，同时进行相应的工艺试验，通过对比仿真和试验得到的鼓形特征验证模型的准确性，利用数值模型获得电磁镦粗的加载特性，分析电磁镦粗试样内部的应力和应变状态。结果 电磁镦粗试样的数值模拟结果与试验结果的最大径向相对误差为5.1%，平均径向相对误差为2.84%;驱动片上磁压力的峰值在时间上大致位于第1个周期的1/4处，在空间上大致位于驱动片半径的5/8处;冲头的最大冲击速度达13.9 m/s，在该冲击速度下电磁镦粗试样内部的应变速率达7 700 s−1;电磁镦粗试样内部的金属塑性流动不均、不同区域的应力状态差异和绝热温升所导致的应力–应变分布与常规镦粗的类似。结论 证明了所建立的电磁镦粗电磁场–力场数值耦合模型的准确性和电磁镦粗工艺的可行性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The work aims to reveal the deformation mechanism of bulk materials through numerical simulation aiming at that the stress and strain results of bulk materials are difficult to obtain in the process of high strain rate forming. A numerical coupling model of electromagnetic field-mechanical field for electromagnetic upsetting was established by combining electromagnetic forming technology and upsetting process, and the corresponding experiments were carried out. The accuracy of the model was verified by comparing the drum shape characteristics of simulation and test results. Then, the loading characteristics of electromagnetic upsetting were obtained by numerical simulation. The internal strain and stress status of the specimen under electromagnetic upsetting were analyzed. For the selected point on the drum edge, the maximum radial relative error between the numerical simulation results and the experimental results was 5.1% and the average radial relative error was 2.84%. The peak magnetic force on the driver plate approximately located temporally and spatially at 1/4 of the first cycle and the 5/8 of the radius of driver plate, respectively. The maximum impact velocity of the punch was 13.9 m/s, and the strain rate inside the upsetting specimen reached 7 700 s−1 at this impact velocity. The distribution of strain and stress was similar to that of conventional upsetting due to uneven metal plastic flow, different stress states in different regions and adiabatic temperature rise. Thus, the accuracy of the established electromagnetic field-mechanical field coupling model for electromagnetic upsetting is verified and the feasibility of electromagnetic upsetting process is proved. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
渝公网安备 50010702501719号