文章摘要
李峰,崔新鹏,王丽娟,等.两种铸造模拟软件在钛合金铸件研制中的应用对比[J].精密成形工程,2018,10(3):163-167.
LI Feng,CUI Xin-peng,WANG Li-juan,et al.Comparison of Two Kinds of Casting Simulation Software on Titanium Alloy Castings Preparing[J].Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering,2018,10(3):163-167.
两种铸造模拟软件在钛合金铸件研制中的应用对比
Comparison of Two Kinds of Casting Simulation Software on Titanium Alloy Castings Preparing
投稿时间:2018-04-19  修订日期:2018-05-10
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-6457.2018.03.029
中文关键词: 数值模拟  钛合金  华铸CAE  ProCast
英文关键词: numerical simulation  titanium alloy  Huazhu CAE  ProCast
基金项目:
作者单位
李峰 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京 100095 
崔新鹏 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京 100095 
王丽娟 北京百慕航材高科技股份有限公司北京 100094 
南海 1. 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京 1000952. 北京百慕航材高科技股份有限公司北京 100094 
周黔 1. 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京 1000952. 北京百慕航材高科技股份有限公司北京 100094 
摘要点击次数: 4591
全文下载次数: 3852
中文摘要:
      目的 研究分析两种铸造模拟软件在钛合金铸件模拟方面的差异及准确性。方法 利用华铸CAE和ProCast软件对某钛合金铸件的温度场、流场和缩孔缺陷进行数值模拟。为了验证模拟结果的准确性,进行实际浇注验证实验,并通过X射线探伤,检测缩孔缺陷的位置。结果 华铸CAE网格剖分简单、计算时间快,但是模型边界拟合较差,ProCast软件网格划分复杂、计算时间较长,但是网格可以较好地反映模型形状,模型边界拟合较高。结论 两种软件对温度场的模拟差异不大,凝固顺序基本一致,两种模拟软件的缩孔预测结果和实际缩孔位置吻合性都较好,说明两种数值模拟软件可以很好地预测钛合金铸件内缩孔分布。
英文摘要:
      The paper aims to study differences and accuracy of two kinds of casting simulation software in simulation of titanium alloy castings. Temperature field, flow field and shrinkage cavity defects of a certain titanium alloy casting were numerically simulated with Huazhu CAE and ProCast software. To verify accuracy of simulation results, an actual pouring verification experiment was performed. The position of shrinkage defect was detected by X-ray inspection. Huazhu CAE was simple in grid generation and its calculation was fast; but the model boundary was poorly fitted. The ProCast software was complex in grid generation and its calculation was long; but the grid could reflect the model shape well, and the calculation accuracy was good. The simulation of the temperature field of the two kinds of software has little difference, and the solidification sequence is basically the same. The simulated shrinkage cavity results of two kinds of software are in good agreement with the actual casting shrinkage cavity position, indicating that the numerical simulation can effectively predict shrinkage cavity distribution in titanium alloy casting.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第13997633位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-6

>版权所有:《精密成形工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

>邮编:400039 电话:023-68679125传真:02368792396 Email: jmcxgc@163.com

>    

渝公网安备 50010702501719号